Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:06

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Amazon knocks up to 50% off Garmin watches — here are 15 deals worth shopping now - Tom's Guide
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Human minds see what we "expect" to see, not what we actually see - Earth.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Gov. Abbott activates state emergency resources ahead of anticipated severe weather - Click2Houston
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Orton advances in the King of the Ring after the Paul Heyman Guys screw LA Knight - Cageside Seats
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do liberals refuse to define what a woman is and what does that mean for the future of feminism?